Which method is NOT typically used for identifying hazards in processes?

The method that is not typically used for identifying hazards in processes is performance reviews. Performance reviews primarily focus on evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of personnel or systems in meeting objectives and fulfilling roles within an organization. They assess past performance rather than actively identifying potential hazards in processes.

In contrast, brainstorming sessions actively engage team members in generating ideas and identifying potential hazards through collaborative thinking and discussion. Checklists are structured tools that guide users through a predetermined list of potential hazards, ensuring that critical factors are systematically considered. Formal analysis techniques such as HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study) or FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) are systematic approaches used to identify and evaluate risks associated with operational processes in great detail, allowing for comprehensive hazard identification.

Therefore, performance reviews do not align with the direct identification of hazards in processes, which is why it is the correct answer in this context.